The largest lie from the service center today has been that an undersea cable got cut in front of Hong Kong multiple times. The problem is only that the routing problems are getting found at the Philippines inside the network from Converge ICT Solutions and not somewhere else.
This fact get shown very simple by reading a tracert (Windows systems) or traceroute (Linux systems). Undersea lines having a longer ping times. And it would make no sense for any Internet provider to register IP-addresses in a foreign country.
The route from Converge ICT Solution to Hong Kong has in common some routers to Los Angeles. So the service staff and managers from Converge hat the stupid idea, that they can sell force majeure to their customers instead of telling the truth to them.
As you can see on the red marked lines in the following screenshots the problem starts between the IP-addresses 18.104.22.168 -> 22.214.171.124 on the Route to Los Angeles, USA, Level3 Network and 126.96.36.199 -> 188.8.131.52 to Hong Kong, Telia.Net.
Here the route to Los Angeles:
The router 184.108.40.206 is really the last router at the Philippines before the undersea cable. But in the following screenshot, the route to Hong Kong, we see the same router with the same IP-address which is before 220.127.116.11. This router has the 18.104.22.168. As 22.214.171.124 makes already problems the failure has to get searched between the routers 126.96.36.199 and 188.8.131.52 in this case.
A little bit more clear is the situation with the route to Hong Kong. There are after the router 184.108.40.206 two more routers cascaded before the data are entering the undersea line. The first one is the router with the IP-address 220.127.116.11 which is forwarding the traffic to the router with the IP-address 18.104.22.168. Both routers are at the Philippines and not one of them gets found underseas:
If an undersea cable got cut on multiple places, then the packet loss is 100% and not like shown in the screenshots 25%. Here we see which deadbeats are working at Converge ICT Solutions.
The first try from the technical support of converge has been to make someone other guilty for their problems - with other words a big lie:
Tsr3 (Converge ICT)
Aug 28, 14:42 CST
The problem from the message above is not only that the content is a lie. The problem is that Converge ICT Solution is the one, with whom I have a contract and who is responsible for the contract. It is their problem if they have hired any subcontractors.
The next lie, which has arrived at my inbox has been:
Tsr3 (Converge ICT)
Aug 28, 15:14 CST
I did not know that from the Philippines is it only 65km to Lantau. The airplane takes a little bit longer than 2 hours. In any case Jaypee has forgotten, that Los Angeles and Hong Kong are not reached over the same undersea cable. I have been thinking that the people at the Philippines are more intelligent, but here we can see, that they are even not able to lie in a way that it sounds believable. If a undersea cable gets cut, then the packet loss is 100% and not only 25%.
Converge ICT Solution promotes at their homepage: "Experience better at home and in the office WITH END-TO-END PURE FIBER TECHNOLOGY". The reality is very different to the promotion. Everybody can see which technical deadbeats they are if they need to use such lies in the case of problems because they are not able to solve the problems. Routing problems and high drop rates are normally at their network.
It looks like that Converge ICT Solutions has big problems by organizing the land transport for a submarine at the Philippines, because they are not able to fix their internal routing problems the whole day. It looks like the only person, who is able to configure routers is on vacations.
A trace done from the other site shows that the international lines from Converge ICT Solutions are not showing any problem and there is no packet loss:
Here is a screenshot from Austria/Europe to the Los Angeles gateway of Converge ICT Solutions located at the Philippines:
It is a bad situation for such deadbeats if they lie to the wrong person!!!
Each provider is using different routes for the case if one drops for the reason of a failure, that the others are overtaking the routing of the traffic. Converge ICT Solutions sees it different. If one route fails, then the others have to stop too.With this system they are only increasing the risk with each additional route that they have a full black out for the case one route fails.
Additional they have increased the bandwidth for the users with the beginning of this month, that the users have now less bandwidth than before, but have to pay more for less. That can get called to be a scam.
Such an amateur Internet provider needs to hide their own routing failures from the public. All incoming traces from the Hong Kong and Los Angeles routes are ending up at the IP address 22.214.171.124. Here an example using the Hong Kong Route:
1 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 192.168.1.1
2 3 ms 15 ms 2 ms 153-108-142-078.ascus.at [126.96.36.199]
3 11 ms 11 ms 10 ms asr-2.ix2.vie.at.as39912.net [188.8.131.52]
4 13 ms 10 ms 23 ms Vl2699-c76-5.ix2.vie.at.as39912.net [184.108.40.206]
5 22 ms 21 ms 22 ms vl72-ae0-mx80-1.ix2.ffm.de.as39912.net [220.127.116.11]
6 23 ms 22 ms 22 ms 100ge7-2.core1.fra1.he.net [18.104.22.168]
7 31 ms 38 ms 42 ms 100ge5-2.core1.par2.he.net [22.214.171.124]
8 52 ms 38 ms 38 ms flag-as-as15412.10gigabitethernet7-13.core1.par2.he.net [126.96.36.199]
9 222 ms 222 ms 222 ms xe-2-2-0.0cjr02.prs001.flagtel.com [188.8.131.52]
10 222 ms 222 ms 222 ms xe-0-0-0.0.pjr04.ldn001.flagtel.com [184.108.40.206]
11 221 ms 232 ms 221 ms ge-0-1-0.0.pjr01.hkg005.flagtel.com [220.127.116.11]
12 222 ms 246 ms 222 ms xe-3-0-1.0.cji02.hkg003.flagtel.com [18.104.22.168]
13 227 ms 226 ms 236 ms 22.214.171.124
14 * 275 ms 276 ms global.hgc.com.hk [126.96.36.199]
15 274 ms 285 ms 274 ms 188.8.131.52
16 274 ms 274 ms 275 ms 184.108.40.206
17 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
18 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
19 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
20 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
21 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
22 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
23 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
24 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
25 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
26 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
27 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
28 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
29 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
30 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
The German phrase "Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung" has the meaning "Request timed out".