My Opinion

nothing but my opinion

Double standard: This Islamic country is the new world-Sex-center

So far, Thailand was considered the global center of cheap sex. Now another country prepares to become the red center of the world. It is just there preached particularly loud morality.

Flashing neon signs in sultry tropical night, music which penetrates from bars and massage parlors. In between women who are stalking around with a swinging butt on high heels. Her short skirts and tight tops have a clear view of a lot of skin.

"Happy Massage" is on welcoming signs. This is not Bangkok, whose sex industry enjoys a legendary reputation. This is Bukit Bintang, an entertainment district in Kuala Lumpur. The Islamic Malaysia is well on the way to Thailand and the Philippines as a red light center of the world to outdo.

Two contradictory faces of the same country: Malaysia with its multicultural society prides itself while still being one of the more moderate Muslim nations of the earth, at the same time; however, take the orthodox tendencies, such as the number of head veil on the streets of Southeast Asian state.

Female stimuli are taboo. Like Sex

At public buildings across the country emblazoned posters urging a "dress appropriately". Free shoulders and bare knees for women are not allowed to offices. Tight outfits from a woman can cause a national outcry, as happened recently in the case of successful gymnast Farah Ann Abdul Hadi. Although they took in the Southeast Asia Games last summer home six shiny medals for Malaysia, but was still vilified publicly.

The Minister of Islamic Affairs, Jamil Khir Baharom wanted, has recognized under her skimpy leotard "the shape of her vagina," and so he called shrilly for "stricter observance of the Islamic dress rules for sports and other areas". For me it looks like the Malaysian Minister of Islamic Affairs seems to be a sex maniac because he shows with his observations where he is looking during a sports contest. I would like to recommend him urgently to search help in a psychiatric clinic. Other, even the Chair of the Women Wing at the National Muslim Youth Association, Roszida Kamaruddin, joined in with the Minister of Islamic Affairs. Female stimuli are taboo. Just as sex.

Smooching and other intimacies in public are prohibited and will be severely punished. Those caught in sexual conduct in a public place, not only has up to 20 years in prison count, but also by caning.

Prostitution is illegal, but the sex trade flourishes

Three young women have made 2010 headlines, because they were sentenced as first "delinquents" of this kind to blows. They had slept before marriage with men. Meanwhile, arranged by the sharia corporal punishment for similar offenses are hardly special messages in Malaysia.

Prostitution is - in contrast to other countries - in Malaysia illegally. Yet the trade flourishes with sex than in almost any other country. The Malaysian sex industry is worth the equivalent of over 960 million dollars, it is said on the website of Havocscope Global Black Market information that examines the global black market.

Even 200 years ago found foreign loggers, sailors and miners on the Malaysian peninsula ladies who hawked their bodies. But these prostitutes worked mainly in clearly defined sin miles in the big cities. Today there is are small brothels, the love hotels and "massage parlors" have everywhere spread in the country - even in regions where the ultra-conservative Islamic Party of Malaysia (PAS) is in charge. And the Internet erotic services are quite open. The authorities look somewhere else, while simultaneously preaching morality, whenever they can.

In Germany, where prostitution is not immoral since 2001, coming in section 49 prostitutes at 10,000 people. Even Thailand is by far not as a cesspool, as many believe the West: There are only 45 sex workers per 10,000 people. But in Malaysia with so many demurely veiled women and strict regional sharia, there are even 52.

The commercial sex was visible to all. But nobody talks about it. On the contrary: The ruling party United Malays National Organization (Umno) of Prime Minister Najib Razak is located chaste and puritanical. Najib is accused of corruption. His coalition has plugged a low blow after another. She needs every voter, they can get. And therefore it curries favor of the Conservatives and uses the religion for their election campaign.

"Women are punished, but no one thinks to their customers"

"Politicians are afraid that it calls into question their piety, because then they annoy voters or could lose," said the woman activist Ivy Josiah. She had defended a prostitute last year, which was arrested by an undercover policeman and sentenced in court to six months in prison because they had offered him sexual services. One should not condemn sex workers, said Ivy Josiah. "It is always sad that women are constantly punished for such acts while not given a thought to their customers."

Malaysian women prostitute themselves mostly out of necessity. Many are single mothers. In addition, an increasing number of students who can pay for their education or a little luxury of suitors, because there are hardly any scholarships or even something like student loans.

Over the past decade also flow women and girls from poorer neighboring countries of Burma, Laos, Vietnam and Cambodia, in Malaysia's brothels. The US has set the country on the black list of states with particularly nasty trafficking and even child prostitution. According to reports, even police officers involved in human smuggling. Again, the politicians mostly closed eyes.

Instead, they discuss publicly whether their home the "Hudud", the strict Sharia criminal law, is intended to introduce, and flare up further on to scarce jerseys their sports stars. Simultaneously, the streetwalker evening walks further lasciviously over the sidewalks. Demand is high: A roaring trade in a bigoted society.

 

Politicians are only incompetent big liars - example "BREXIT"

Please accept before reading this article that I'm neither for nor against the European Union. This article shall only show how politicians are scamming their voters. These stupid idiots have even no plan for the case they are in need fulfill their own election promises. The only idea they have is to revoke their own promises and let everything like it is. Who is able to trust such liars? Who needs such losers and liars?

The incompetence from politicians gets already shown in the contracts from the European Union. The European Union has to wait now until the United Kingdom invokes the article 50 from the Lisbon contract. From the site of the European Union can get done nothing to kick out a single member country, where some politicians like to make some local political capital by acting against the union. That means one single member country can take all the other members from the union into their hostage for playing their own populist gimmicks. Which idiots have made such contracts that can get canceled only from one site? Are all these contracts made from decrepit old people suffering on dementia or the politicians have not yet outgrown from their kindergarten age and sandbox shenanigans? Where get some common sense found in such a case?

The central slogan of the "BREXIT" campaign has been "getting back the control over our country". But for all those who believed to the UKIP boss Nigel Farage and Tory Boris Johnson the jubilation is short. The leaders of the EU exit movement lost after the announcement of the voting results no time, to distance themselves from their own promises.

The end result was not yet four hours old, since the head of the right-wing populist UK Independence Party relativized (UKIP) Nigel Farage on Friday already one of the key promises of "Leave" campaign: In the ITV program "Good Morning Britain" said the UKIP -politician that he could not guarantee that, as announced by the "BREXIT"-supporters 350 million pounds per week instead of the EU now went to the Health Service.

"That was one of the mistakes the, 'Leave' campaign has made," the EU-parliamentarian said on Friday. He had thus not advertised. "You have to understand that I was excluded from the campaign and I have, as always, done my own thing." Certainly Farage had heard during the election campaign that the "Leave" camp campaigned so - and before the vote never said a word about lost that this promise might be untenable.

On Saturday rowed the conservative outlet advocates, the British EU-parliamentarian Daniel Hannan, the most important - and most crucial - topic, immigration, return. Opposite the BBC Hannan literally said: "Frankly, if people who voted, believing that there will now be no more immigration from the EU, they will be disappointed."

Yet on June 1, Johnson said that the "is automatic right for all EU citizens in the UK to live and work end for a vote for the exit." The "Leave" campaign had instead promised a tough Australian immigration model for EU citizens.

The reactions in the social networks on Hannans statements of disappointed "Remain"-supporters were not long in coming:

@ianpatterson99

Daniel Hannan has the most bare faced cheek I've seen in a politician: he knew before Thursday how his imigration promise was being heard

2016-06-25T08:01:13+0000

Another one summed up:

@HaveIGotNewsForYou

With Nigel Farage dismissing Leave's NHS pledge and Dan Hannan saying immigration won't fall, Britain realises it's voted for bendy bananas.

2016-06-24T19:39:54+0000

Among the hashtags "#Bregret" and "#WhatHaveWeDone" the result was debated on Twitter over the weekend. There were, however, more EU supporters who expressed their incomprehension and anger at the "Leave voters, not actually repentant". Proposed referendum on United Kingdom membership of the European Union voters.

The London ex-mayor Boris Johnson, who is now considered a leading candidate to succeed David Cameron as leader of the conservative Tories and as premier, for his part stressed in his first speech Friday morning that there was no need to rush the withdrawal from the EU. He also saw no need to make use of Article 50 of the Lisbon contract, so Johnson, one of the leaders of the "BREXIT" campaign. This would require the completion of exit negotiations within two years.

Matthew Elliott, chief of the "BREXIT" campaign, expressed himself similar. He wants to allow unofficial negotiations with the EU, such as on access to the single market or the EU passport for financial institutions, the freedom of access to EU capital markets, before submitting an official letter. "It would be the best if the dust can place down over the summer and using the time for informal negotiations with other countries. We don’t believe that is the best to invoke Article 50 quickly."

During the election campaign had Johnson and Co. of course in all their performances gives the impression that each additional day in the EU is a lost day for the United Kingdom. It turns out: After the vote is not before the vote - at least in terms of the promise of the "BREXIT" - supporters.

My opinion is, if the people would deport all the politicians to isolated islands without any return possibility, the politicians will not get missed from someone. The world would even be a better place if such scammers are getting removed from their sham jobs. As long as politicians can not be held responsible for their doings nothing will change. Changes are only possible if the politicians can be held liable with their private assets and their campaign promises are enforceable. Each business and each private person has a higher liability risk than any politician.

 

The true face of Facebook

Facebook CensorshipRegularly hear the accusation that Facebook practicing censorship. This is not about racism or incitement to violence. But practice to blocked profiles of persons criticism of Islam or immigration policy. Or to certain visual content, such as to the body, which are displayed in the "extremely adverse" way: So Facebook founded in May 2016, the deletion of a photograph with the obese US model Tess Holliday, who had campaigned for bikinis in oversize.

Facebook as an aesthetic education police? The social network as a machine which controls our perception, programmed by social engineers with connections to the elite of our countries? One is not paranoid if one sees Facebook as a global media power - at its 1.6 billion users. What allows this platform or not, democracy and cultural policy relevance.

Algorithms shape our perception long, and when the blocking of certain views or aesthetic variations to come, vigilance is required. Whether it is a cartoon of the "New Yorker", which was censored in 2012, because the nipples of a woman could be seen. Or to a Russian photo with kissing homosexuals that had to disappear along with a Turkish side that showed images of the Prophet Muhammad after the attack on the satirical magazine "Charlie Hebdo".

Or the latest example from Germany: The Catholic theologian and Islam critic David Berger commented after the assassination of Orlando critical of Islam, after his side was blocked. Berger told a Christian media magazine: "In Orlando a fanatical Islamist directed a bloodbath among gays, and Facebook disables users who criticize the Islamism." And further: "was the Inquisition compared to Facebook, a refuge of fairness and justice.”

Bergers reaction is understandable but exaggerated. There are no pyres for uncomfortable users. Also you can Facebook no homophobia or pro-Islam policy reproach. Rather, it seems as if depending on the country just a certain mainstream preferred. In the US and in Europe Facebook promotes integration devout views that want to provoke any division among Muslims in the West, no matter how many deaths the last stop cost. One preferred images that speak for a productive public health and obesity. And of course favored Facebook "pro choice" and "pro gay", including nearly 100 gender options offered to us the network gender conformity.

It should be clear that everything that disturbs here disappears from the platform.

No, this is not a conspiracy. Facebook shows its true face, ironically against the initial vision. Mark Zuckerberg sought a platform to show the human face. He wanted the "Face" of our world, to share around the globe hopes, beliefs or concerns. Now it becomes clear: on Facebook man should not show his true colors, because it is in the end not to the people but to support and projection of very specific ideas and interests.

This makes Facebook a reflection of today's society, which constantly motivates us, corrected and optimized. The ideal of the present: the voluntary self-exploitation. The productive psyche from the creative team of the company. It should be clear that everything that disturbs here - too personal, too bulky to integration critically - disappears from the platform. And not just from Facebook. There we find it easy even to, at least temporarily.

 

Fake news from the international press: "Alcohol during Ramadan? We’ll torch you!"

This story shows what happens if journalists are copying from each other, without turning on their brain. Some stupid journalists and editors think of the headline and want to make money. Unfortunately, what sounds too good to be true it usually is. Readers need to use their own brain and not believe the content only for the reason that it is written somewhere. We find in the international press the following news:

The problem is only that the whole story is nothing else than a fake. By taking a look at the following picture you'll recognize the fake too:

  • At the above picture it seems that the apparent victim has a lot of blood on his clothing and some on his body.

  • The apparent victim has no visible wounds. For this reason the blood can come only from his nose or his mouth, but there you don't see any traces.

  • The picture shows the apparent victim smiling. With such an amount of blood loss after a 4 minute fight, a real victim would not be able to smile because his face would be swollen and each muscle would hurt so much that he would cry with a broken nose and with some lost teeth.

  • Drying blood has a darker color especially by such an illumination like the picture got taken.

  • That the fluid which should be the blood is nothing else than a water and color mixture gets shown edge of the bloodstains. Bloodstains have everywhere the same color, but in the picture are the edges of the bloodstains much brighter than in the center. This shows that colored water got used for producing the fake picture.

  • Real blood clots fast - within a minute or two. At the picture is it still wet. That shows that it is not real blood what we see.

  • You don't see one hit by watching the Youtube video. All what you see is some people standing at the door and you hear some sound. What is happening outside is only an illusion.

  • Even the people blocking the view of the camera by standing in front of the door are in a civilized country a case for the state attorney for the reason of failure to aid performance.

The video and the news posting have only one reason, which got into the news too. This reason and the result can get found at

abc news: After Turkey Radiohead Attack, Police Tear Gas Protesters
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
ISTANBUL — Jun 18, 2016, 3:38 PM ET

Only stupid ones and hooligans are participating at demonstrations for no reason!