My Opinion

Please accept before reading this article that I'm neither for nor against the European Union. This article shall only show how politicians are scamming their voters. These stupid idiots have even no plan for the case they are in need fulfill their own election promises. The only idea they have is to revoke their own promises and let everything like it is. Who is able to trust such liars? Who needs such losers and liars?

The incompetence from politicians gets already shown in the contracts from the European Union. The European Union has to wait now until the United Kingdom invokes the article 50 from the Lisbon contract. From the site of the European Union can get done nothing to kick out a single member country, where some politicians like to make some local political capital by acting against the union. That means one single member country can take all the other members from the union into their hostage for playing their own populist gimmicks. Which idiots have made such contracts that can get canceled only from one site? Are all these contracts made from decrepit old people suffering on dementia or the politicians have not yet outgrown from their kindergarten age and sandbox shenanigans? Where get some common sense found in such a case?

The central slogan of the "BREXIT" campaign has been "getting back the control over our country". But for all those who believed to the UKIP boss Nigel Farage and Tory Boris Johnson the jubilation is short. The leaders of the EU exit movement lost after the announcement of the voting results no time, to distance themselves from their own promises.

The end result was not yet four hours old, since the head of the right-wing populist UK Independence Party relativized (UKIP) Nigel Farage on Friday already one of the key promises of "Leave" campaign: In the ITV program "Good Morning Britain" said the UKIP -politician that he could not guarantee that, as announced by the "BREXIT"-supporters 350 million pounds per week instead of the EU now went to the Health Service.

"That was one of the mistakes the, 'Leave' campaign has made," the EU-parliamentarian said on Friday. He had thus not advertised. "You have to understand that I was excluded from the campaign and I have, as always, done my own thing." Certainly Farage had heard during the election campaign that the "Leave" camp campaigned so - and before the vote never said a word about lost that this promise might be untenable.

On Saturday rowed the conservative outlet advocates, the British EU-parliamentarian Daniel Hannan, the most important - and most crucial - topic, immigration, return. Opposite the BBC Hannan literally said: "Frankly, if people who voted, believing that there will now be no more immigration from the EU, they will be disappointed."

Yet on June 1, Johnson said that the "is automatic right for all EU citizens in the UK to live and work end for a vote for the exit." The "Leave" campaign had instead promised a tough Australian immigration model for EU citizens.

The reactions in the social networks on Hannans statements of disappointed "Remain"-supporters were not long in coming:

@ianpatterson99

Daniel Hannan has the most bare faced cheek I've seen in a politician: he knew before Thursday how his imigration promise was being heard

2016-06-25T08:01:13+0000

Another one summed up:

@HaveIGotNewsForYou

With Nigel Farage dismissing Leave's NHS pledge and Dan Hannan saying immigration won't fall, Britain realises it's voted for bendy bananas.

2016-06-24T19:39:54+0000

Among the hashtags "#Bregret" and "#WhatHaveWeDone" the result was debated on Twitter over the weekend. There were, however, more EU supporters who expressed their incomprehension and anger at the "Leave voters, not actually repentant". Proposed referendum on United Kingdom membership of the European Union voters.

The London ex-mayor Boris Johnson, who is now considered a leading candidate to succeed David Cameron as leader of the conservative Tories and as premier, for his part stressed in his first speech Friday morning that there was no need to rush the withdrawal from the EU. He also saw no need to make use of Article 50 of the Lisbon contract, so Johnson, one of the leaders of the "BREXIT" campaign. This would require the completion of exit negotiations within two years.

Matthew Elliott, chief of the "BREXIT" campaign, expressed himself similar. He wants to allow unofficial negotiations with the EU, such as on access to the single market or the EU passport for financial institutions, the freedom of access to EU capital markets, before submitting an official letter. "It would be the best if the dust can place down over the summer and using the time for informal negotiations with other countries. We don’t believe that is the best to invoke Article 50 quickly."

During the election campaign had Johnson and Co. of course in all their performances gives the impression that each additional day in the EU is a lost day for the United Kingdom. It turns out: After the vote is not before the vote - at least in terms of the promise of the "BREXIT" - supporters.

My opinion is, if the people would deport all the politicians to isolated islands without any return possibility, the politicians will not get missed from someone. The world would even be a better place if such scammers are getting removed from their sham jobs. As long as politicians can not be held responsible for their doings nothing will change. Changes are only possible if the politicians can be held liable with their private assets and their campaign promises are enforceable. Each business and each private person has a higher liability risk than any politician.

Regularly hear the accusation that Facebook practicing censorship. This is not about racism or incitement to violence. But practice to blocked profiles of persons criticism of Islam or immigration policy. Or to certain visual content, such as to the body, which are displayed in the "extremely adverse" way: So Facebook founded in May 2016, the deletion of a photograph with the obese US model Tess Holliday, who had campaigned for bikinis in oversize.

Facebook as an aesthetic education police? The social network as a machine which controls our perception, programmed by social engineers with connections to the elite of our countries? One is not paranoid if one sees Facebook as a global media power - at its 1.6 billion users. What allows this platform or not, democracy and cultural policy relevance.

Algorithms shape our perception long, and when the blocking of certain views or aesthetic variations to come, vigilance is required. Whether it is a cartoon of the "New Yorker", which was censored in 2012, because the nipples of a woman could be seen. Or to a Russian photo with kissing homosexuals that had to disappear along with a Turkish side that showed images of the Prophet Muhammad after the attack on the satirical magazine "Charlie Hebdo".

Or the latest example from Germany: The Catholic theologian and Islam critic David Berger commented after the assassination of Orlando critical of Islam, after his side was blocked. Berger told a Christian media magazine: "In Orlando a fanatical Islamist directed a bloodbath among gays, and Facebook disables users who criticize the Islamism." And further: "was the Inquisition compared to Facebook, a refuge of fairness and justice.”

Bergers reaction is understandable but exaggerated. There are no pyres for uncomfortable users. Also you can Facebook no homophobia or pro-Islam policy reproach. Rather, it seems as if depending on the country just a certain mainstream preferred. In the US and in Europe Facebook promotes integration devout views that want to provoke any division among Muslims in the West, no matter how many deaths the last stop cost. One preferred images that speak for a productive public health and obesity. And of course favored Facebook "pro choice" and "pro gay", including nearly 100 gender options offered to us the network gender conformity.

It should be clear that everything that disturbs here disappears from the platform.

No, this is not a conspiracy. Facebook shows its true face, ironically against the initial vision. Mark Zuckerberg sought a platform to show the human face. He wanted the "Face" of our world, to share around the globe hopes, beliefs or concerns. Now it becomes clear: on Facebook man should not show his true colors, because it is in the end not to the people but to support and projection of very specific ideas and interests.

This makes Facebook a reflection of today's society, which constantly motivates us, corrected and optimized. The ideal of the present: the voluntary self-exploitation. The productive psyche from the creative team of the company. It should be clear that everything that disturbs here - too personal, too bulky to integration critically - disappears from the platform. And not just from Facebook. There we find it easy even to, at least temporarily.

Has the Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan forged his college diploma? After several media reports the title is older than the university that issued it. The Turkish Constitution stipulates that the president must present a high school diploma.

His diploma is issued in 1981 by Marmara University, now doubts as to its authenticity have risen. The problem: The University was founded in the 1982. Even the dean and the rector, who allegedly signed, got hired 1982. Graphic artists took the floor that the font in which the diploma is written, was not on the market in the year 1981. In addition, the public transport company of the city of Istanbul provides proudly at their website that Erdogan has been working until 1981 as a full-time worker at their company.

The allegations accompanied Erdogan his entire presidency, but would probably be without the opposition pro-Kurdish "Democratic Party of Peoples" (HDP) forgotten. Their steady demand to the Election Commission to submit the diploma from Erdogan, led last week to success.

"There are allegations of forgery," says the deputy Idris Baluken of the HDP. "It would be easy to refute it: date of enrollment, the list of the awarded diplomas and the original of the diploma." But President and Commission would give "not satisfactory answers".

Yusuf Hallacoglu, deputy leader of the right "Nationalist Action Party" (MHP), was incensed: "I say to the President: Your diploma is a fake and what is he doing? He is even not pulling me in front of the law court?" Hallacoglu was among the first who declared publicly that Recep Tayyip Erdogan did not meet the requirements to hold the office of Turkish President.

According to the Turkish Constitution only candidate can be elected president, who are older than forty years old and be able to prove a university degree with a minimum of four years of study. But Erdogan attended only one educational institution that issued diplomas after two years and possesses no admission as University explains MHP politicians Hallacoglu. This seems more likely, as Erdogan graduated from the religious Imam Hatip schools. At that time, graduates from religious schools did not got accepted from universities.

Before the presidential elections of 2014 finally the wind was taken out of the sails of the allegations. The Rector of Marmara University, Zafer Gül, a loyal follower of the ruling AKP and a friend of Erdogan, published a photograph of Erdogan's diploma. Erdogan was a graduate of Marmara University - he had studied at the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences.

Critics fear that the debate about Erdogan's diploma will remain without consequences. The Electoral Commission rejected requests for checking the authenticity of the diploma. The strongest opposition party in parliament, the Republican People's Party (CHP) has even tabled a motion to remove the university degree as a prerequisite for president under the Constitution. The reasoning is remarkable: “Not only Erdogan’s reputation gets damaged from the speculation about his diploma, but Turkey and the office of the president”.

Elsewhere gets such a behavior called ad hoc legislation. My opinion is that the reputation from Erdogan, the office of the president and the Turkey got already damaged because the law existed and got broken already.

And yet, although the country's media avoid the subject, it spreads through the social networks. Erdogan is not squeamish when it comes to libel. Even students, who post on Facebook anything critical about him, need to fear the revenge of the president. He has placed thousands of lawsuits since he got elected, but that the President has no university degree, it may be said with impunity, as already Yusuf Hallacoglu of the MHP has done it.

If it would come to a trial, the diploma would probably need to get presented as a proof for Erdogan.

This story shows what happens if journalists are copying from each other, without turning on their brain. Some stupid journalists and editors think of the headline and want to make money. Unfortunately, what sounds too good to be true it usually is. Readers need to use their own brain and not believe the content only for the reason that it is written somewhere. We find in the international press the following news:

• CNN: Islamists attack Radiohead fans at Turkish release party
  A group of men attacked fans at a Radiohead listening party Friday in Istanbul, apparently angry the fans were drinking during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan.
  By Gul Tuysuz and Merieme Arif, CNN
  Updated 2237 GMT (0637 HKT) June 18, 2016
  
  
• Dailymail/Mail Online: Shocking video shows mob of 20 Islamist extremists attacking guests at a Radiohead party for drinking during holy month of Ramadan in Turkey
  Mob stormed record store in Istanbul during live stream event on Friday
  They yelled 'I'm going to kill you, I'll burn this place with you inside'
  A man in the video said they broke beer bottles over his friend's head
  At lest two people were injured at the event, according to local media
  By EKIN KARASIN FOR MAILONLINE
  PUBLISHED: 15:42 GMT, 18 June 2016 | UPDATED: 16:30 GMT, 18 June 2016
  
  
• Business Standard: Islamists attack Radiohead fans in Turkey
  They trashed the store, hurled insults and broke up the release party of the album A Moon Shaped Pool
  AFP/PTI | Istanbul
  June 18, 2016 Last Updated at 16:07 IST
  
  
• Daily News: Radiohead fans assaulted in Istanbul for 'drinking alcohol' during Ramadan
  A group of 20 assailants carrying sticks and bottles entered a record store in central Istanbul on June 17, beating up store owners and Radiohead fans who were at a listening party of the band's new album, A Moon Shaped Pool.
  ISTANBUL June/18/2016
  
  
• Newsweek: RADIOHEAD FANS ATTACKED IN ISTANBUL FOR SERVING ALCOHOL DURING RAMADAN
  At least one person was injured when extremists attacked a Radiohead listening party in Istanbul Friday.
  BY NICHOLAS LOFFREDO ON 6/18/16 AT 11:48 AM
  
  
• Aljazeera: Turkish Radiohead fans attacked for 'consuming alcohol'
  Music group offers "love and support" to Istanbul fans beaten for listening to music and drinking beer during Ramadan.
  Turkish media reports say a group of men stormed a record store in Istanbul and attacked fans of a British pop group who were attending an album-listening event, claiming that they were "drinking beer during Ramadan".
  
  
• Die Welt: "Alkohol im Ramadan? Wir fackeln euch ab!"
  Eine Gruppe junger Leute wird in Istanbul brutal attackiert - weil sie im Ramadan Bier trinkt. Die Tat ereignet sich just nahe dem Stadtteil, der Inbegriff ist für das säkulare Leben in der Türkei.
  Von Deniz Yücel, Istanbul, Türkei-Korrespondent

The problem is only that the whole story is nothing else than a fake. By taking a look at the following picture you'll recognize the fake too:

• At the above picture it seems that the apparent victim has a lot of blood on his clothing and some on his body.
  
  
• The apparent victim has no visible wounds. For this reason the blood can come only from his nose or his mouth, but there you don't see any traces.
  
  
• The picture shows the apparent victim smiling. With such an amount of blood loss after a 4 minute fight, a real victim would not be able to smile because his face would be swollen and each muscle would hurt so much that he would cry with a broken nose and with some lost teeth.
  
  
• Drying blood has a darker color especially by such an illumination like the picture got taken.
  
  
• That the fluid which should be the blood is nothing else than a water and color mixture gets shown edge of the bloodstains. Bloodstains have everywhere the same color, but in the picture are the edges of the bloodstains much brighter than in the center. This shows that colored water got used for producing the fake picture.
  
  
• Real blood clots fast - within a minute or two. At the picture is it still wet. That shows that it is not real blood what we see.
  
  
• You don't see one hit by watching the Youtube video. All what you see is some people standing at the door and you hear some sound. What is happening outside is only an illusion.
  
  
• Even the people blocking the view of the camera by standing in front of the door are in a civilized country a case for the state attorney for the reason of failure to aid performance.

The video and the news posting have only one reason, which got into the news too. This reason and the result can get found at

abc news: After Turkey Radiohead Attack, Police Tear Gas Protesters
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
ISTANBUL — Jun 18, 2016, 3:38 PM ET

Only stupid ones and hooligans are participating at demonstrations for no reason!